| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
FEBRUARY 2006 |
|
|||||
|
EDITORIAL:
THE HULLABALLOO OVER ANCIENT INDIAN HISTORY Suddenly, historical issues like the Aryan Invasion Theory and the Indian caste system have become topics of hot debate in California as activists and parents harangue the state panel over demands for changes in California school textbooks. The issue has ramifications beyond California, because the textbook market in this state is so huge that what California decides can become the benchmark for the nation. Hindus and ancient India is being unfairly maligned, some protesters say, and they are suggesting changes to rectify that. But some of the top South Asia scholars in universities here and in India including Harvard’s Michael Witzel, UCLA’s Stanley Wolpert and Jawaharlal Nehru University’s Romila Thapar have joined in a written warning that there is a hidden agenda behind the protests, and most of their demands have little historical merit. South Asia scholars Sunaina Maira and Raja Swamy show in our cover story that what is being portrayed as a grassroots community plea for changes in school textbooks is actually a concerted move by Hindutva supporters to promote their own Hindu chauvinist worldview. Chicago cardiologist Enas Enas, MD, has been researching the issue for decades, and has written a remarkably reader-friendly book for the general public that not only draws a detailed picture of how heart disease affects South Asians, but provides a roadmap on how to identify, prevent, control, and even reverse it. Drawing on years of painstaking medical investigation, epidemiological research, personal observation, and clinical practice, Enas has condensed the most salient information and insights to create a compendium of knowledge on how to win the war against premature, malignant heart disease. What shines through, most of all, is his passionate belief in plural, democratic values. “It is a commonplace these days that the West is the home of religious freedom and democracy: when George W Bush talks of bringing these ideas to the Muslim world, he envisages exporting them from the West to the East,” wrote William Dalrymple while reviewing the book in The Times of London. “It is, therefore, no bad thing to be reminded by Amartya Sen, in this profound and stimulating collection of essays, that the East has its own venerable traditions of public participation in decision-making, of government by discussion, and of religious tolerance. Indeed, as Sen points out, while most of Catholic Europe was given over to the Inquisition, and in Rome Giordano Bruno was being burnt at the stake for heresy, in India the 16th-century Mogul emperor Akbar was declaring, ‘No man should be interfered with on account of religion, and anyone is to be allowed to go over to a religion that pleases him.’” We carry a discussion of the book in this issue. The sad answer is: Not a whole lot. Yet many immigrant communities, particularly people of color, have a lot in common. The struggle to adapt and fit into a new society, balancing Asian and Western values, coping with immigrant life, the sheer socio-cultural challenge of maintaining one’s personal dignity and identity, especially if you are from a Third World country these are issues that affect all of us, and there is much we could learn from the experience of other communities. Vietnamese writer Ky-Phong Tran’s searingly honest commentary reflects the reality of not only his culture, but of many ethnic communities in this country. We present his award-winning article for our readers. COVER STORY: History Hungama: The California Textbook Debate - By Sunaina Maira and Raja Swamy Who would have thought that the merits of the Aryan Migration Theory would be hotly debated in California? As bemused Americans look on, the acrimonious arguments go on, with battle lines sharply drawn. While the battle has been portrayed in some of the media as arguments between Hindu parents and U.S. scholars, there is much more than meets the eye, write Sunaina Maira and Raja Swamy. There has been such a hullabaloo over proposed changes in California history textbooks that even mainstream U.S. newspapers are beginning to notice. So what’s the fuss all about?California state textbooks come up for review every six years. This year, the sixth-grade history and social science texts are under review, and a controversy has arisen over the sections relating to ancient Indian history. Most of these textbooks are inadequate for a number of reasons and have many errors on Indian history. Taking advantage of this inadequacy, two groups: Vedic Foundation and Hindu Education Foundation, backed by the Hindu American Foundation all with demonstrable ideological and organizational links to Hindu supremacist organizations inserted themselves into the revision process. But instead of just making corrections to erroneous texts, the VF-HEF are pushing through changes that reflect their supremacist and chauvinistic political agendas, seeking to equate the history of India with the history of Hinduism, and the living, diverse religion of Hinduism with a Brahmanical, Vedic religion frozen in time for thousands of years.
Promotion of a narrow and sectarian viewpoint within Hinduism as representing the entire religion. According to the edits of HEF/VF, Hinduism is described as a homogenous, monotheistic, brahmanical and revealed religion. This description subverts the pluralistic traditions and diverse viewpoints and attempts to promote only one sectarian viewpoint. Sanitization of caste and gender inequalities in ancient and present-day India, thus silencing a large number of peoples’ struggles against injustice and oppression. Some of the proposed edits attempt to invalidate the very identity and existence of lower caste “untouchables” (Dalits) in India. The ahistorical notion that the speakers of the Indo-European languages (Aryans) in ancient India were indigenous to India instead of the currently accepted historical research that gives them a Central Asian origin. The legitimization of this thesis is tied, not to any differing scholarly viewpoint, but simply to a wider contemporary Hindu nationalist political agenda of proving that while Hindus were “indigenous”, the Christians and Muslims who arrived in India later were “invaders.” As things stand now, the HEF and VF have managed to get the Curriculum Commission to agree to a large number of their suggested changes in alignment with their Hindu nationalist/supremacist ideology know as Hindutva. The only opposition they faced was a last minute organizing by some Indologists (M. Witzel from Harvard, Stanley Wolpert from UCLA and J. Heitzman from UC Davis with around 50 other scholars supporting them, (http://www.people.fas.harvar
book/Archaeogenetics_Key_Studies.html. By selectively citing one study, the HEF and VF wanted to declare victory and get their claims codified in textbooks for sixth grade students. When the scientific “evidence” is shown to be false the HEF and VF claim that scholars whose research invalidates their claims have motives against Hinduism. Thus they assert that their struggle to overturn current research is part of a struggle by an aggrieved minority community in the U.S. to achieve respect. The shrill anti-intellectual rhetoric of the HEF and VF against individual scholars in the U.S. and India is identical to that meted out to Indian and other scholars by the Sangh Parivar in India. By labeling the Aryan Invasion/Migration theory as racist the HEF and VF, like their counterparts in the Sangh Parivar, deliberately confuse the colonial era versions of the Aryan invasion theory, such as that attributed famously to Max Muller, with the current scholarship on the issue. The available body of research on the Aryan invasion/migration theory is not just massive it spans more than two-dozen fields of study and constitutes a far more complex range of debates and ideas than those attributed to Max Muller and other colonial historians, Orientalists and Indologists. As for Max Muller’s racial views of the Aryan invasion, historians like Romila Thapar and D.N. Jha have critiqued these long discredited positions decades ago. By making Max Muller into a straw man, the HEF and VF can justify their refusal to accept the mountain of evidence spanning several fields of research and study that points to a Central Asian origin to the Indo Aryans. Modus Operandi While HAF founder Mihir Meghani advises Muslims in India that “Hindutva is here to stay, it is up to the Muslims whether they will be included in the new nationalistic spirit of Bharat,” (See sidebar: The Tail Wagging the Dog), HAF aids the HEF and VF in casting the campaign to rewrite textbooks as an effort to promote Hindu minority rights in the U.S. This inversion reveals the insidious tendency of the Sangh Parivar to exploit anti-racist language to further its goals. It wears the garb of an aggrieved minority in order to appease the multi-culturalist sentiments of the wider American public who are generally oblivious to the politics of Hindutva in the U.S. or in India. Most well-meaning Indians and other Americans would not want to side with white academics against aggrieved Hindus, a sentiment exploited by the HEF and VF. As if this were not enough, these organizations also mimic the legendary viciousness of the Sangh Parivar’s tactics. S. Kalyanaraman, advisor to the HEF refers to the Indo-Eurasian Research run by Michael Witzel as “a Communist-leaning political list better known for its uncritical beliefs in myths like Aryan Invasion and its negation of historical facts..” This advisor to the HEF also believes that “it is time to attack the ‘secular’. It is a dirty word, a dirty system and should be used as a word of abuse against anyone who does not adhere to Sanatana Dharma…I think secularism should be deemed a negation of Dharma, anti-Dharma, a word of abuse and hence rejected altogether.” Such contradictions between stated antipathy towards minority rights in India and as champions of minority rights in the U.S. do not seem to bother the HEF and VF. Yet when Dalit groups intervened and voiced their strong objections to the California State Board of Education, the HEF and VF switched their tunes to more-familiar strains: outright vilification of Dalits on Hindutva Internet forums and Web sites ranging from dismissal of the very term Dalit, to vitriol that only confirms the deep-rooted anti-Dalit orientation of the Hindutva movement.
Indeed, many of the textbook “edits” proposed by the HEF and VF center on erasing references to oppressive aspects of the caste system in ancient India. The HEF, for instance, wants this entire sentence deleted: “The caste system is just one example of how Hinduism was woven into the fabric of daily life in India.” This effort also included the removal of references to Dalits. The HEF suggested replacing the following sentence: “In modern India, these people are now called Dalits, and treating someone as an untouchable is a crime against the law.” with this one: “In modern India, treating someone as an untouchable is a crime against the law.” The Vedic Foundation goes even further by claiming in response to a sentence that reads: “Indian society divides itself into a complex structure of social classes based particularly on jobs. This class structure is called the caste system,” that the caste system no longer exists in modern India since the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to equality. The assertion that the caste system no longer exists is especially offensive given the persistence of systematic caste-based violence directed at Dalit communities throughout India. If the desired erasure of Dalits and the cruel legacy of the caste system from history textbooks represents one type of violence, the hate-speech openly articulated by HEF members and their allies speaks volumes about the propensity for further levels of violence. S. Kalyanaraman, senior advisor to the HEF for example opines about Dalit Christians that: “These converts are not stupid, they are simply empowered by tainted money, the only way they could make a living and a very good one at that. In practice, few of them are employable to actually do a job of work.” “Calling them ‘dalit’ is an insult to the entire legacy of dharma. It is being increasingly abused as a hate word by proselytizing groups for their nefarious purposes.” According to this HEF advisor, “(Dalit International Solidarity Network) is a mullah-missionary-Marxist axis.” Kalavai Venkat, who is listed as an author on the Web site ‘Voice of Dharma’ (a project of the ‘Hindu Mahasabha of America’ run by Vishal Agarwal) has been a fervent proponent of the Hindutva textbook rewrite effort. After the setback faced by the HEF and VF following the Dalit intervention in the textbook issue, Venkat engaged in anti-Dalit outbursts on a Hindutva forum that he moderates. Kalavai Venkat: “It is also true that those who call themselves ‘Dalits’ are hate-mongers and racists. They never were oppressed themselves but received benefits of reservation due to vote-bank politics, whereby they deprived a meritorious student of his/her place. All ‘Dalit’ associations in universities/offices are parasitic” Outrageous declarations of this kind promote a tyrannical and violent image of Brahmanical power, confirming that the Hindutva agenda remains fundamentally a Brahmanic project intent on the continuation of the subjugation of Dalits. These sentiments are expressed by Jit Majumdar, a member of this forum, who opined: “You depraved hate-monger, poisoned and caustic minds like yours deserve to be spat and trod upon. You are lowly ‘dalits’ because of your own depraved nature and character. Nobody else have to make you low. You creatures are natural scum with my shoe on your head,” Jit Majumder The sheer crudeness on display above shows that behind the benign garb of ‘education’ lies a supremacist agenda that easily slips into uninhibited rage and hatred for Dalits. One of the main successes of Hindutva mobilizations is reflected in the way in which the media has been covering this issue in an alarming manner this “controversy” is consistently framed as a debate between some faculty (who are represented as white and non-Hindus) and a monolithic, aggrieved Hindu community. Posing the conflict along racial lines allows for a complete dismissal of genuine scholarship and the diversity of views within the community itself. The HEF and VF’s entry into the textbook issue is cast as one impelled by the needs of Hindu students or the concerns of Hindu parents. There is no doubt that the instructional materials up for review in California contain problematic histories and need revision. Some of the statements and images in the textbooks are indeed Orientalist, and there are problematic representations of South Asian culture. But the efforts of the HEF and VF to take advantage of these discrepancies and launch a whole series of changes that have little to do with historical accuracy or the removal of biased representation has to be opposed. Their proposed changes in fact advance the biased and twisted worldview of Hindutva which sees all non-Hindus as outsiders and therefore less deserving of full rights as citizens in India. These proposed edits also erase Dalits from ancient India, whitewash the caste system and falsify the history of gender oppression. This issue is not only about what sixth grade American students will learn in California. It is also not about how well or badly ancient India appears to either students or their parents. By reducing the study of history to a matter of cheery representations of the past, we fail to provide students with the critical tools necessary to recognize and act upon various forms of oppression in the present. The oppression of Dalits and women in India and South Asia is widespread and current. How are students to be equipped to deal with these contemporary oppressions when their history books, thanks to the HEF and VF, effectively erase Dalits, glorify the caste system and falsify the oppression of women in history textbooks? Is pride to be achieved at the cost of knowledge? And if so, pride in what? - Sunaina Maira is associate professor of Asian American studies at the University of California at Davis and author of ‘Desis in the House: Indian American Youth Culture in New York City.’ |TOP|
HEALTH: Heart Disease Epidemic What South Asians Need to Know A silent but deadly epidemic of heart disease is raging in South Asia and among the people who emigrated from there. After 15 years of researching heart disease among South Asians in the U.S., Enas Enas, MD introduces a book he has written for the general public about why this killer epidemic is occurring, and how to identify, prevent, control and even reverse it. ![]() There is a silent but deadly epidemic of heart disease raging on the Indian subcontinent Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lankaand people who emigrated from there. Why this killer epidemic is occurring, and what can be done about it? In the past decade and a half I have researched heart disease among people of South Asian Indian descent and explored ways of how to identify, prevent, control, and even reverse it. In the early 1990s, when I began publishing articles in cardiology journals about heart disease among Indians, many in the medical community were skeptical that heart disease was any more prevalent among Indians than other populations. Through conducting autopsies and studying disease on the population level, pathologists and epidemiologists had known about these high rates for several decades. Internists, family practitioners, and even cardiologists, in contrast, were largely unaware of the epidemic. Something was wrong. In response, I decided to set the story straight. For the past 15 years, I have maintained a laser-like focus on this tsunami of heart disease sweeping the Indian subcontinent, drawing attention to it through research, journal publishing, and about 100 speaking engagements a year. Gradually, medical professionals both Indian and non-Indian have become familiar with this massive problem. The public, however, still barely knows about it, including the Indian public. My book, “How to Beat the Heart Disease Epidemic Among South Asians: A Prevention and Management Guide for Asian Indians and their Doctors,” is aimed at stemming and reversing the tide. In paper after paper, I have shown that the data are both undeniable and startling: For example, immigrants from the Indian subcontinent living in the U.S. have a rate of premature heart disease three to four times higher than that of other Americans, regardless of gender or socioeconomic background. More recent studies suggest that heart disease rates among the more than a billion people living on the subcontinent, particularly in urban areas, are as high as, or higher than, the rates observed among Indians in the U.S. Researchers now conservatively estimate that at least one out of ten Indians suffers from heart disease. One out of ten is simply an extraordinary figure. Morally and medically, it is also an unacceptable one. In the Western world, incidence and death rates from cardiovascular disease continue to decline from their peak in the 1960s, because of lifestyle changes and improvements in treatment. In South Asia, by contrast, these rates are rising. According to data from the American Heart Association and the World Health Organization, in 1985 as many as 145 men per 100,000 and 126 women per 100,000 died from heart disease in India. By 2015, those numbers are expected to hit 295 for men and 239 for women a doubling of rates over three decades, and this, despite the fact that a large proportion of Asian Indians are non-smoking vegetarians with normal levels of cholesterol, body weight, and blood pressure.
Here are six key features: Prematurity. Heart attacks strike many Indians at a relatively young age (40-60 years). Many Indians know of fellow Indians who suffered their first attack when they were just 35 or even 25. Severity. Among Indians, heart disease tends to be severe, malignant, and diffuse (spread out along an artery instead of in just one or two spots), making it hard to treat with bypass surgery or angioplasty. Many cases are simply inoperable. Even when successfully carried out, such procedures often serve only as temporary fixes. The underlying problem remains the continuing buildup of plaque in the arteries. This means that, despite repeat surgeries and angioplasties, the blockages often return with a vengeance, leading to premature death. Equally high rates among women. Until recently, heart disease was considered “a man’s disease.” Unlike in other ethnic groups, however, heart disease rates among Indian men and women are virtually identical, despite relatively low rates of smoking among Indian women. High rates of heart disease despite low rates of the traditional risk factors. The prevalence of smoking, hypertension, high cholesterol, and obesity the traditional heart disease risk factors is similar or lower among Indians in the US compared to other Americans. Yet for any given level of cardiac risk factors, Indians are at about twice greater risk of developing heart disease. Predilection for diabetes. Diabetes is 2-4 times more common among Indians in the U.S. than other Americans. It occurs at a younger age, and even in the absence of obesity. Diabetes and heart disease appear to be strongly interactive among Indians one leads to the other within a matter of 10-20 years. A combination of genetic susceptibility and lifestyle factors. Indians seem to be more vulnerable to heart disease because of a genetic predisposition to abdominal obesity, high blood levels of a substance called lipoprotein(a), and a small-particle type of HDL (good) cholesterol that offers less protection against heart disease. These heredity-based risk factors magnify the harmful effects of lifestyle risk factors associated with physical inactivity, urban living, and a high-fat diet. We now have the technology, diagnostic tests, and medications to help you lower your risk factors substantially. While your genes may have loaded the gun, it is lifestyle choices that pull the trigger. Working with your doctor, you can significantly reduce your risk of heart disease through appropriate lifestyle changes and medications. As advances in genetics and biotechnology usher in a new era of “personalized medicine,” we can look forward to a time when doctors will be able to offer their patients even more effective combinations of cardiovascular medications and risk-reduction strategies that are custom-tailored to each patient’s unique individual genetic makeup. Yet even today, we have enough knowledge to reduce most people’s heart disease risks to surprisingly low levels if only more people would grasp the urgency of the need to do this, and translate that urgency into practical preventive action. If I may offer you a brief but telling example. My co-author, Dr. Sudesh Kannan, had what many would consider a healthy lifestyle. He was predominantly vegetarian. He did not smoke. He exercised 20 minutes three times a week. He was not obese by traditional standards. So it came as a complete surprise when routine blood tests revealed that he had dyslipidemia, meaning that his blood lipids were gravely out of balance. He had low levels of HDL (good cholesterol) and high levels of LDL (bad cholesterol). His triglycerides, a marker for diabetes, were above 500 mg/Dl three times the normal level. With the same perseverance that earned him a doctorate from the University of Virginia, Sudesh decided to attack dyslipidemia, researching it in books and medical papers and looking for advice not only on how to treat it but on how to manage it through a healthy diet and increased physical activity. Then in 1995 Sudesh’s brother, a physician, sent him an article I had published in Clinical Cardiology (vol. 18, 1995) titled “Malignant Heart Disease in Young Indians.” That article, Sudesh says, marked a turning point in his life. Not only did he regain control over his cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but he went on to run three marathons and complete two 100-mile bike rides. Today, his energy level is astounding. I can unhesitatingly state that Sudesh’s health is a testament to the proposition that small lifestyle changes can yield major rewards in quality of life. Consider this: In many ways, the human body is constantly trying to heal itself. From T-cells to homeostasis, it has a sophisticated array of self-corrective systems within it that are all designed to do one thing: keep the body in optimal health. Give it the right inputs of daily physical activity, plenty of water, and a healthy diet, and it will respond magnificently often far better than any medication can get it to do. Sudesh joined me to co-author my book because he is concerned about one thing: much of what I have uncovered and published in journals over the past 15 years, he says, still remains unknown to the average Indian, and even many physicians. Not only are the prevention and management strategies for Indian heart disease unfamiliar, but the dimensions of the problem itself have not been fully grasped. It remains under the radar. The Indian Ocean tsunami of December 26, 2004 that killed an estimated 290,000 people received extensive 24-hour international media coverage as well it should. The response was magnificent and appreciated. To put it in perspective, however, heart disease kills more people in the nation of India alone than the tsunami did every three months. That fact does not even make it into the Health Section of most major newspapers, never mind primetime TV news. Yet every three months, more than 300,000 Indians slip away under the waves of coronary artery disease. Heart disease has indeed become the “Silent Scream” among South Asians snuffing out lives by the thousands every day while others go on with their lives, oblivious to the killer stalking the region.
Over the past 15 years, I have presented and conducted more than 1,000 lectures and seminars to physicians in the U.S. and India as well as Indians living in Chicago on the subject of heart disease. My book distils the extensive feedback I have received from my audiences and seminar participants into a set of practical preventive and treatment strategies. It is intended to serve as a quickly digestible companion to a more professional edition, “Heart Disease among South Asians: Unraveling the Mysteries, Debunking the Myths,” scheduled for release in 2006. Excerpted from the preface of “How to Beat the Heart Disease Epidemic Among South Asians: A Prevention and Management Guide for Asian Indians and their Doctors” by Enas Enas, M.D., and Dr. Sudesh Kannan. Indians indeed have a higher prevalence of high levels of genetically determined cholesterol that is partly responsible for the high rates of heart disease. Among Indians, heart disease strikes hard and at a young age. Indians tend to have heart disease in their 30 and 40s and they tend to have a severe form of heart disease that leads to repeat angioplasty and bypass surgery. What are some of your key recommendations? First and foremost Indians have to accept that they have a higher risk of heart disease at a given level of cholesterol, blood pressure, body weight and other risk factors. The threshold of intervention and goal of treatment should be different. For example, people with heart disease or diabetes are treated to more stringent cholesterol goals than people without this condition. My recommendation is to treat all Indians without heart disease or diabetes as aggressively as Americans with these conditions. Who should read this book? How will they benefit from reading your book? We have special sections in this book for persons who have already been diagnosed with heart disease and who have had coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. This book is a must read for people who have had these procedures. It discusses at length the strategies for minimizing the need for repeat procedures. Those with family history of heart disease at a young age will also benefit from reading this book because it addresses special tests that focus on such individuals. What about people suffering from diabetes? Will they find this book valuable? Can I automatically assume that my family physician is up-to-date on the latest research on Indians and heart disease? Most Indians I know are vegetarian. Can they be at high risk for heart disease? |